Dynamic methodologies and use of teaching materials for teaching Physics and Chemistry in the laboratories of the Beatriz Cueva de Ayora unit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i2.719Keywords:
innovative teaching, active learning methodologies, meaningful learning, critical thinking, academic performance.Abstract
The teaching of Physics and Chemistry at the senior high school level at Beatriz Cueva de Ayora School faces significant challenges related to low student motivation, limited participation, and insufficient development of critical thinking skills, which are reflected in poor academic performance. There is a noticeable lack of interest in scientific subjects due to the predominance of theoretical content and the limited application of knowledge in real-life contexts.
This situation is largely associated with traditional teaching practices characterized by minimal classroom interaction, limited use of educational technologies, and insufficient implementation of innovative instructional resources. Additionally, the school’s infrastructure—particularly science laboratories—is not fully utilized, restricting opportunities for experimental and inquiry-based learning.
In response, the educational project adopts a research-oriented approach focused on analyzing current pedagogical practices and designing innovative teaching strategies. It proposes the incorporation of active learning methodologies, the integration of educational technologies, and the development of experimental activities that promote meaningful learning and a deeper understanding of the national curriculum content.
Through the implementation and evaluation of these strategies, the project aims to improve students’ attitudes toward Physics and Chemistry, strengthen critical thinking and problem-solving skills, and encourage the application of scientific knowledge to everyday situations. Ultimately, the proposal seeks to enhance educational quality and academic performance in science education at the high school level.
Keywords: innovative teaching; active learning; meaningful learning; critical thinking; science education; academic performance.
Downloads
References
Atkins, P., & de Paula, J. (2022). Atkins' physical chemistry (12th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Atkins, P., & de Paula, J. (2022). Atkins' physical chemistry (12th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C., Woodward, P., & Stoltzfus, M. (2022). Chemistry: The central science (15th ed.). Pearson.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Caballero-Meneses, S. Y., Vergara Causo, E. S., Melgarejo, V. G., & Rodríguez-Barboza, J. R. (2025). Metodologías activas en la educación latinoamericana: una revisión sistemática sobre su impacto en el aprendizaje significativo. Revista InveCom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16076292
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2022). Fundamentals of physics (12th ed.). Wiley.
Heredia-Arias, M., Sandoval-Romero, R., Cacoango-Yucta, W., & Rumbaut-Rangel.. D. (2024). Estrategias metodológicas para potenciar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de la asignatura de Química para los estudiantes de tercer año de bachillerato. MQRInvestigar, 8(4), 6444–6461. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.8.4.2024.6444-6461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.8.4.2024.6444-6461
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
McQuarrie, D. A., Simon, J. D., & Gallogly, E. B. (2022). Physical chemistry: A molecular approach. University Science Books.
Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D., & Bissonnette, C. (2023). General chemistry: Principles and modern applications (12th ed.). Pearson.
Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D., & Bissonnette, C. (2023). General chemistry: Principles and modern applications (12th ed.). Pearson.
Piaget, J. (1978). La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas: Problema central del desarrollo. Siglo XXI Editores.
Sailema-Hurtado, T., Lucero Garcés, M., Aguirre-León, A., & Escobar-Escobar, M. (2023). Metodologías activas para la enseñanza aprendizaje de física en el bachillerato. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(1), 9446–9477. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i1.5069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i1.5069
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2023). Physics for scientists and engineers (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2023). Physics for scientists and engineers (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Trejo, G., Domínguez, J., Gordillo, E., & Constantino, F. (2024). STEAM integrada con metodologías activas para mejorar el rendimiento académico y percepción de estudiantes en educación primaria. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(1), 8670–8687. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10199
UNESCO. (2019, 29 de noviembre). Necesaria la educación STEAM+H para cultivar un pensamiento y habilidades transformadoras, innovadoras y creativas para avanzar hacia un desarrollo sostenible.
Vásconez Paredes, C. D., & Inga Ortega, E. M. (2021). El modelo de aprendizaje TPACK y su impacto en la innovación educativa desde un análisis bibliométrico. INNOVA Research Journal, 6(3), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v6.n3.2021.1773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v6.n3.2021.1773
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Olga Esperanza Aguirre Carrión
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Eres libre de:
- Compartir : copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar : remezclar, transformar y desarrollar el material
- El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando usted cumpla con los términos de la licencia.
En los siguientes términos:
- Atribución : Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente , proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios . Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
- No comercial : no puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales .
- CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- Sin restricciones adicionales : no puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros hacer algo que la licencia permite.
