Machine Learning Algorithms for the Early Identification of Sepsis in Geriatric Post-Surgical Patients: A Bibliographic Review Integrating Internal Medicine and General Surgery Perspectives

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i1.746

Palabras clave:

Sepsis, Machine Learning, Geriatric Patients, Post-Operative Care, Early Diagnosis, Interdisciplinary Care, Bibliographic Review

Resumen

Introduction: Sepsis represents a critical threat to geriatric patients following surgical procedures, with early detection hampered by atypical presentations and complex comorbidities. This bibliographic review examines the current evidence on machine learning (ML) applications for early sepsis identification in geriatric post-surgical populations.

Objective: To synthesize and analyze existing literature on ML algorithms that integrate surgical and internal medicine parameters for early sepsis detection in geriatric post-operative patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2015 to 2024. Studies focusing on ML applications for sepsis prediction in geriatric surgical populations were included and critically appraised.

Results: The review identified 28 relevant studies demonstrating that ML models, particularly ensemble methods like Random Forest and XGBoost, consistently outperform traditional scoring systems. Integration of surgical parameters (operative duration, blood loss) with internal medicine metrics (comorbidity indices, laboratory trends) significantly enhanced predictive accuracy.

Conclusion: ML algorithms show substantial promise for improving early sepsis detection in geriatric surgical patients through interdisciplinary data integration. Future research should focus on clinical implementation, model interpretability, and ethical considerations.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adams, R., Henry, K. E., Sridharan, A., Soleimani, H., Zhan, A., Rawat, N., ... & Saria, S. (2022). Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis. *Nature Medicine*, *28*(7), 1455–1460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0

Angus, D. C., & van der Poll, T. (2021). Severe sepsis and septic shock. *New England Journal of Medicine*, *385*(9), 840-851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208623

Despins, L. A. (2017). Automated detection of sepsis using machine learning: A systematic review. *Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing*, *31*(6), 1225-1232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000066

Fleuren, L. M., Klausch, T. L. T., Zwager, C. L., Schoonmade, L. J., Guo, T., Roggeveen, L. F., ... & Thoral, P. J. (2020). Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. *Intensive Care Medicine*, *46*(3), 383–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y

Futier, E., Lefrant, J. Y., Guinot, P. G., Godet, T., Lorne, E., Cuvillon, P., ... & Pereira, B. (2017). Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial. *JAMA*, *318*(14), 1346-1357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14172

Giannini, H. M., Ginestra, J. C., Chivers, C., Draugelis, M., Hanish, A., Schweickert, W. D., ... & Fuchs, B. D. (2019). A machine learning algorithm to predict severe sepsis and septic shock: development, implementation, and impact on clinical practice. *Critical Care Medicine*, *47*(11), 1485–1492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003891

Horng, S., Sontag, D. A., Halpern, Y., Jernite, Y., Shapiro, N. I., & Nathanson, L. A. (2017). Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning. *PLOS ONE*, *12*(4), e0174708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174708

Moor, M., Rieck, B., Horn, M., Jutzeler, C. R., & Borgwardt, K. (2021). Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU using machine learning: A systematic review. *Frontiers in Medicine*, *8*, 607952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607952

Reyna, M. A., Josef, C. S., Jeter, R., Shashikumar, S. P., Westover, M. B., Nemati, S., ... & Clifford, G. D. (2019). Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019. *Critical Care Medicine*, *48*(2), 210-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004145

Shimabukuro, D. W., Barton, C. W., Feldman, M. D., Mataraso, S. J., & Das, R. (2017). Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial. *BMJ Open Respiratory Research*, *4*(1), e000234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000234

Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., ... & Angus, D. C. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). *JAMA*, *315*(8), 801-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287

Wong, A., Otles, E., Donnelly, J. P., Krumm, R., McCullough, J., DeTroyer-Cooley, O., ... & Singh, K. (2021). External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. *JAMA Internal Medicine*, *181*(8), 1065–1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-30

Cómo citar

Alvarracin Vinueza, E. L., Lema Balla, J. C., Loyola Cevallos, E. S., Rodríguez Jácome, B. F., & Supe Chancay, K. S. (2026). Machine Learning Algorithms for the Early Identification of Sepsis in Geriatric Post-Surgical Patients: A Bibliographic Review Integrating Internal Medicine and General Surgery Perspectives. ASCE MAGAZINE, 5(1), 3327–3341. https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i1.746

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a