Positive Administrative Silence in Ecuador: Application and Effects on the Simplification of Procedures: Study on the implementation of administrative silence as a mechanism for procedural efficiency.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/ASCE/1299.1317/2025

Keywords:

Administrative silence, simplification of procedures, administrative law, presumed act, public administration.

Abstract

Positive Administrative Silence (PAS) is now part of the Ecuadorian legal system as a mechanism aimed at ensuring prompt responses from the public administration, while also streamlining administrative procedures. However, this practical use has significant limitations, which affect its effectiveness as a guaranteed instrument and, consequently, its effectiveness. This research aimed to study the application of SAP in Ecuador and its impact on streamlining procedures, based on a documentary review of regulations, case law, technical reports, and a new body of doctrinal literature. The results reveal an asymmetric application of SAP in the various administrative areas, with its application being much more evident in the productive sectors and almost nonexistent in social services. During the investigation, evidence emerged of regulatory gaps, regulatory contradictions, and the lack of single application protocols. This creates legal uncertainty, forcing citizens to resort to contentious proceedings even after obtaining a favorable silence. The SAP also allegedly creates certain automatisms in its application, especially those procedures that require a technical assessment or substantive justification. It is concluded that SAP, although legally recognized, does not operate fully effectively due to structural, operational, and regulatory limitations. Its effectiveness depends on institutional strengthening, procedural clarity, and technical training, conditions not yet consolidated in the Ecuadorian public sector.The study provides relevant input for legal reflection and the improvement of administrative practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cedeño Loor, R. M. (2023). La ejecución del silencio administrativo y el debido proceso en Ecuador. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(2), 1516–1537. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5417

Cevallos Gorozbel, E. M., & Quiñonez Francis, H. S. (2018). El silencio administrativo positivo en la legislación ecuatoriana. Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, 14(1). https://www.eumed.net/rev/oel/2018/10/silencio-administrativo-ecuador.html

Collaguazo Fiallo, L. V., Coloma Rodríguez, M. E., Sánchez Arias, D. A., & Valle Melena, E. S. (2024). El Silencio Administrativo en el Ecuador: Un análisis crítico, jurídico y académico. Tesla Revista Científica, 4(2), e402. https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v4i2.e402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v4i2.e402

Delgado Ruiz, J., Torres Moncayo, E., & Cabrera, S. (2023). Normativa y praxis del silencio administrativo en Ecuador: Riesgos del automatismo sin motivación técnica. Revista de Derecho Administrativo Ecuador, 3(1), 45–60. https://estudiosyperspectivas.org/index.php/EstudiosyPerspectivas/article/view/101

Jara Rubio, S. C., Yugcha Quinatoa, A. M., Vásquez Chicaiza, F. P., García Flores, A. L., & Galarza Castro, C. X. (2024). Silencio administrativo en el recurso de revisión y el derecho de petición en Ecuador. Revista Lex, 7(25), 512–526. https://revistalex.org/index.php/revistalex/article/view/274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33996/revistalex.v7i25.197

Laines Bravo, J., & Macas Parrales, J. (2019). Innovaciones del silencio administrativo en el Ecuador. FIPCAEC, 8(2), 66–85. https://fipcaec.com/index.php/fipcaec/article/view/806

Polo del Conocimiento. (2025). El silencio administrativo como mecanismo de garantía de derechos en los procedimientos administrativos. Polo del Conocimiento, 10(6), 3338–3347. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/9582

Revista Código Científico. (2023). La oportunidad para la ejecución del silencio administrativo ante los Tribunales de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Código Científico, 4(1), 280–282. https://revistacodigocientifico.itslosandes.net/index.php/1/article/view/118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/ccri/v4/n1/118

Robalino Andino, S. (2022). Ejecutabilidad del silencio administrativo en el Ecuador y su incidencia en el administrado [Tesis de posgrado, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo]. http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/10195

Vallejo Moreno, E. C., & Ruiz Bautista, J. A. (2023). La ejecución del silencio administrativo frente a los principios de calidad, eficacia y eficiencia. Polo del Conocimiento, 8(9), 930–946. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/6062

Zambrano Reyna, Í. A. (2024). El silencio administrativo y su efecto de caducidad en la competencia de la administración: Un enfoque desde lo jurisdiccional. Portal de la Ciencia, 6(2), 343–353. https://www.revistasocialfronteriza.com/ojs/index.php/rev/article/view/315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(3)315

Published

2025-08-05

How to Cite

Benítez-Triviño, A. S., Montero-Villena, G. M., Marcillo-Balseca, J. C., & Liza-Acuña, R. M. (2025). Positive Administrative Silence in Ecuador: Application and Effects on the Simplification of Procedures: Study on the implementation of administrative silence as a mechanism for procedural efficiency. ANNALS SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION, 4(3), 1299–1317. https://doi.org/10.70577/ASCE/1299.1317/2025

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.