Extensor Septal 2024: Enfoque Submamario Para cartílago Costal. Rinoplastia Holística
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i2.848Keywords:
Saddle nose deformity; costal cartilage rhinoplasty; septal extension graft; holistic surgery; submammary incision; cartilage warping prevention; donor-site morbidity.Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty in patients with severe saddle nose deformity, short nose, or significant caudal septal deficiency presents a significant reconstructive challenge, often requiring robust structural support. Conventional graft sources such as septal or auricular cartilage are frequently insufficient for major reconstructions, while traditional costal cartilage harvesting is associated with visible scarring and donor-site morbidity.
Objective: This study introduces and evaluates the "Septal Extender 2024" technique, a novel holistic rhinoplasty method utilizing costal cartilage harvested via a discrete submammary approach. The technique aims to provide reliable structural support while minimizing graft warping and donor-site scarring.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 consecutive patients undergoing complex rhinoplasty with the Septal Extender 2024 technique. The protocol includes a concealed submammary incision for cartilage harvest, a proprietary carving and lamination protocol to neutralize internal cartilage tension and prevent warping, and secure multi-point fixation of the graft to restore dorsal support, tip projection, and rotation. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using standardized 3D photogrammetry, patient-reported outcome measures (FROI-17, NOSE scale), independent surgeon evaluation (ROE), and donor-site scar assessment (POSAS, VAS).
Results: The mean follow-up period was 9.3 months. There were no cases (0%) of clinically significant graft warping or resorption. Nasal function improved significantly, with mean FROI-17 scores decreasing from 52.3 to 24.1 (p < 0.001) and NOSE scale scores from 68.2 to 17.5 (p < 0.001). Aesthetic outcomes were excellent (mean ROE score: 84.6/100). Donor-site morbidity was minimal, with high patient satisfaction (VAS: 9.2/10) and no hypertrophic scarring.
Conclusion: The Septal Extender 2024 technique provides a holistic, reliable, and reproducible solution for complex nasal reconstruction, effectively addressing structural deficiencies while optimizing aesthetic outcomes and minimizing donor-site morbidity through a concealed submammary approach.
Downloads
References
Adams, W. P., Rohrich, R. J., Gunter, J. P., & Clark, C. P. (2018). The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: A controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 123(1), 256-261. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181904d8e
Alsarraf, R., Larrabee, W. F., Jr., Anderson, S., Murakami, C. S., & Johnson, C. M., Jr. (2001). The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire: A validated patient-reported outcome measure for rhinoplasty. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 3(4), 244-247. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.3.4.244
Constantian, M. B. (2005). Rhinoplasty: Craft and magic. Quality Medical Publishing.
Daniel, R. K. (2020). The saddle nose deformity: Classification and surgical management. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 73(3), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.10.033
Draaijers, L. J., Tempelman, F. R., Botman, Y. A., Tuinebreijer, W. E., Middelkoop, E., Kreis, R. W., & van Zuijlen, P. P. (2004). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 113(7), 1960-1965. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122207.28773.56
Drake, R. L., Vogl, A. W., & Mitchell, A. W. M. (2019). Gray's anatomy for students (4th ed.). Elsevier.
Gibson, T., & Davis, W. B. (1958). The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: Its cause and prevention. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 10, 257-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(57)80042-3
Gunter, J. P., Landecker, A., & Cochran, C. S. (2019). Frequently used grafts in rhinoplasty: Nomenclature and analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144(1), 135e-147e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005712
Lee, M., & Kim, Y. W. (2022). Surgical management of the saddle nose deformity: A systematic review. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 30(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2021.12.003
Mohan, R., Fisher, M., & Pearlman, S. J. (2021). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in rhinoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 147(1), 170e-181e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007478
Sailon, A. M., Schachar, J. S., & Levine, J. P. (2019). Computer-aided design and 3D printing for costal cartilage graft planning. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 27(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2018.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2018.08.010
Spielmann, P. M., White, P. S., & Hussain, S. S. (2009). Surgical techniques for the treatment of nasal valve collapse: A systematic review. The Laryngoscope, 119(7), 1281-1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20495
Stewart, M. G., Witsell, D. L., Smith, T. L., Weaver, E. M., Yueh, B., & Hannley, M. T. (2004). Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 130(2), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.016
Suh, M. K., Lee, K. H., & Han, S. K. (2016). Extended spreader graft in septal reconstruction: A 10-year experience. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 137(4), 1164-1171. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002035
Toriumi, D. M. (2006). Structural approach to primary rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 26(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.01.007
Toriumi, D. M., & Dixon, T. K. (2021). The role of rib cartilage in structural rhinoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 9(3S), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003456
Wee, J. H., Park, M. H., Oh, S., & Jin, H. R. (2020). Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: A meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 22(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.1945
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cristhian Saúl Rengifo Berruz, Kevin Alexander Meneses Guaman, José Roberto Lema Balla , Juan Pablo Pulgarin Medina , Juan Carlos Lema Balla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Eres libre de:
- Compartir : copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar : remezclar, transformar y desarrollar el material
- El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando usted cumpla con los términos de la licencia.
En los siguientes términos:
- Atribución : Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente , proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios . Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
- No comercial : no puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales .
- CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- Sin restricciones adicionales : no puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros hacer algo que la licencia permite.
