Assessment of Sinus Bone Remodeling Using Low-Dose Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Patients with Nasal Polyposis and Severe Asthma on Biologic Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i3.1094Keywords:
nasal polyposis; severe asthma; monoclonal antibodies; bone remodeling; osteitis; cone beam computed tomographyAbstract
Nasal polyposis (NP) and severe asthma (SA) are clinical manifestations of type 2 inflammation, associated with significant tissue remodeling, including bone changes (osteitis). The impact of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) on this bone component remains insufficiently characterized. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate changes in sinonasal bone remodeling using low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-LD) in patients with NP and SA after 12 months of biologic therapy. A retrospective, multicenter case series analysis was conducted, including 110 adult patients with bilateral NP (Nasal Polyp Score ≥5) and uncontrolled SA (ACQ-7 ≥1.5) who initiated treatment with dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab. CBCT-LD images were acquired at baseline (T0) and at 12 months (T12). A semiautomated algorithm was developed to quantify Sinus Wall Thickness (SWT, in mm) in six anatomical regions and a volumetric Global Osteitis Index (GOI). Clinical outcomes assessed included the SNOT-22 questionnaire, Sniffin' Sticks olfactory test, FEV1%, and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose. Results showed that dupilumab induced the greatest reduction in both SWT (-18.7%, p<0.001) and GOI (-22.5%, p<0.001). Significant reductions in SWT were also observed with mepolizumab (-12.3%, p=0.002), benralizumab (-9.1%, p=0.01), and omalizumab (-5.4%, p=0.03). For GOI, benralizumab showed a significant reduction (-15.8%, p=0.004), whereas reductions with mepolizumab (-7.1%, p=0.06) and omalizumab (-4.2%, p=0.18) did not reach statistical significance. The reduction in SWT in the anterior ethmoid wall strongly correlated with improvement in SNOT-22 (r=0.71, p<0.001) and olfactory function (r=0.64, p<0.001). The mean effective dose of CBCT-LD was 0.08 mSv. It is concluded that treatment with mAb, particularly dupilumab, induces a significant and quantifiable regression of pathological bone remodeling, closely associated with clinical improvement. CBCT-LD emerges as a safe and valid tool for assessing structural biomarkers of response to biologic therapy.
Downloads
References
Ariji, Y., Fukuda, M., Kise, Y., Nozawa, M., & Ariji, E. (2016). Contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT for image-guided ablation therapy of jaw carcinoma: Comparison of intravenous and intra-arterial contrast injection. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 45(5), 20160007. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160007
Bachert, C., Han, J. K., Desrosiers, M., Hellings, P. W., Amin, N., Lee, S. E., ... & Investigators, L. N. S. (2019). Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): Results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. The Lancet, 394(10209), 1638–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1
Fokkens, W. J., Lund, V. J., Hopkins, C., Hellings, P. W., Kern, R., Reitsma, S., ... & Bernal-Sprekelsen, M. (2020). European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology, 58(Suppl S29), 1–464. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin20.600
Georgalas, C., Videler, W., Freling, N., & Fokkens, W. (2015). Global Osteitis Scoring Scale and chronic rhinosinusitis: a marker of revision surgery. Clinical Otolaryngology, 40(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12315
Hoang, S., Eastwood, J. D., & Orlandi, R. R. (2021). The role of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 in the development of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and associated osteitis. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 11(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22733
Hopkins, C., Gillett, S., Slack, R., Lund, V. J., & Browne, J. P. (2009). Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clinical Otolaryngology, 34(5), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x
Juniper, E. F., Svensson, K., Mörk, A. C., & Ståhl, E. (2005). Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. Respiratory Medicine, 99(5), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2004.10.008
Pauwels, R., Beinsberger, J., Collaert, B., Theodorakou, C., Rogers, J., Walker, A., ... & Horner, K. (2012). Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. European Journal of Radiology, 81(2), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028
Snidvongs, K., McLachlan, R., Chin, D., Pratt, E., Sacks, R., Earls, P., & Harvey, R. J. (2018). Osteitic bone: A surrogate marker of eosinophilia in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Rhinology, 56(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin17.153
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Evelyn Giomaira Guamán Tibán , Isabella María Cornejo Cruz , Karol Melissa Tituana Tinoco , Ana Paula Alarcón Espinoza , Karen Joseline Achig Coronel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Eres libre de:
- Compartir : copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar : remezclar, transformar y desarrollar el material
- El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando usted cumpla con los términos de la licencia.
En los siguientes términos:
- Atribución : Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente , proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios . Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
- No comercial : no puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales .
- CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- Sin restricciones adicionales : no puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros hacer algo que la licencia permite.














