Integration of agroecology and fundamental ancestral knowledge for sustainable rural development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i2.863

Keywords:

Agronomy; Agricultural biology; Agricultural engineering; Agricultural research; Agricultural chemistry.

Abstract

This study analyzed the integration of agroecology and ancestral knowledge as the foundations for sustainable rural development in the communities of the Shushufindi canton, Sucumbíos province, Ecuador. The objective was to identify the role of traditional knowledge and its integration with agroecological principles in local agricultural management. The research employed a mixed-methods approach using both quantitative and qualitative methods, including surveys of 120 farmers in the area and semi-structured interviews with community leaders. The results showed that family farming is one of the main forms of productive activity, practiced on small and medium-sized plots, which promotes crop diversity and contributes to family food security. A high level of community appreciation for ancestral knowledge and its importance for environmental and productive sustainability was identified. It was observed that agroecology is recognized as a beneficial strategy for soil conservation, reducing the use of agrochemicals, and long-term sustainability, although its implementation is limited by factors such as technical training. It is concluded that communities are in the process of transitioning toward more sustainable agricultural systems, characterized by the interaction between traditional knowledge and contemporary technical approaches; this highlights the need to strengthen training, local governance, and institutional support to consolidate the integration of agroecology and ancestral knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batas, M., Flor, R., Harja, D. L., y Yaday, S. (2025). Understanding smallholder farmers’ perceptions of agroecology. Sustainable agriculture NPJ, 3(13), 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00056-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00056-2

Bernal, M. (2024). Un panorama comparativo de la agroecología en cinco regiones: Hacia la integración holística y transdisciplinar. Ar@cne. Revista Electrónica de Recursos en Internet sobre Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 28(29), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1344/ara2024.291.44775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/ara2024.291.44775

Borsari, B. (2024). De los agronegocios a la agroecología y la transición hacia un sistema alimentario sostenible en Panamá. IPC, Revista de Investigacion y pensamiento crítico, 12(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.37387/ipc.v12i1.375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37387/ipc.v12i1.375

Caren, M. (2024). Estimating a finite population mean under two-phase sampling using exponential ratio estimator. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/estimating-a-finite-population-mean-under-two-phase-sampling-using-exponential-ratio-estimator/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.90410

Chavez, A., Guerra, M., y Yaguana, G. (2024). Estrategias de la Agricultura Familiaren el Ecuador. Estudios de caso en contextosde agronegocio y migración. Eutopía, Revista de Desarrollo Económico, 46-64. https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/eutopia/article/view/6341/5005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17141/eutopia.26.2025.6341

Contreras, J. (2023). Agricultura familiar, base de la comercialización agroecológica. Revista Economía, 75(122), 67-81. https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/ECONOMIA/article/view/4551/6979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29166/economa.v75i122.4551

Espluga, J., López, D., Calvet, L., Di Masso, M., A, P., y Tendero, G. (2019). Agroecología, conocimiento tradicional e identidades locales para la sostenibilidad y contra el despoblamiento rural. Revista PH (98), 108-130. https://doi.org/10.33349/2019.98.4468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33349/2019.98.4468

Gárgano, C. (2023). Agroextractivism in Argentina environmental health, scientific agendas, and socioecological crisis. Frontiers in Public Health, Opinion article, 11(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1304514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1304514

Gómez, E., Corbera, E., y Reyes, V. (2023). Traditional ecological knowledge and global environmental change: Research findings and policy implications. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06288-180472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06288-180472

Gómez, L., Pacheco, D., Beltran, M., Ramimrez, Y., y Grismaldo, A. (2024). Participatory methods for indigenous community planning and development in the Colombian Amazon. Latin American Research Review, 31(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2397360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2397360

Hennink, M., Kaiser, B., y Weber, M. (2019). What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research. SageJournals. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692

Hernández, R. (2022). Definiciones de los enfoques cuantitativo y cualitativo, sus similitudes y diferencias" en. En R. Hernández, C. Fernández, y P. Baptista, Métodos y técnicas de investigacion social (sexta edición ed., págs. 2-21). México: McGraw Hill Education. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/58257558/Definiciones_de_los_enfoques_cuantitativo_y_cualitativo_sus_similitudes_y_diferencias.pdf?1738380391=yresponse-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DDefiniciones_de_los_enfoques_cuantitativ.pdfyExpires=176

Jiménez, L., Jiménez, W., González, L., Quichimbo, P., Fierro, N., y Capa, D. (2024). Rescuing local knowledge with regards to soil management and fertility in the Amazon Region of Ecuador. Environmental Development, 50, 100984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.100984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.100984

Mejía, J. (2025). Tendencias emergentes en la investigación agroecológica: Integración de saberes locales y tecnologías para la resiliencia y soberanía alimentaria frente al cambio climático en comunidades rurales. Vitalia Revista Científica y Académica, 6(2), 1305-1331. https://doi.org/10.61368/r.s.d.h.v6i2.678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61368/r.s.d.h.v6i2.678

Pelchor, J., y de la Fuente, G. (2025). Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural: un enfoque integral para la sostenibilidad agrícola. Perspectivas rurales, 23(46), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.15359/prne.23-46.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/prne.23-46.4

Ramirez, A., Ravera, M., Rivera, F., y Calvet-Nogués, M. (2023). Gendered traditional agroecological knowledge in agri-food systems: a systematic review. BMC Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 19, 11. https://ethnobiomed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13002-023-00576-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00576-6

Sánchez, E., y León, G. (2024). Transición agroecológica: epistemología y metodología para estudiar sustentabilidad y transformación social en territorios mexiquenses. Ciencia y Reflexión Revista Cientifica Multidisciplinar, 3(2), 803-837. https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v3i2.66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v3i2.66

Toledo, V. M., y Barrera, N. (2022). Los pueblos indígenas y la sustentabilidad: Saberes, prácticas y territorios. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Chichande Brabo, E. (2026). Integration of agroecology and fundamental ancestral knowledge for sustainable rural development. ANNALS SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION, 5(2), 2020–2042. https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i2.863

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.