Mobile Development Productivity Benchmark: Flutter vs. Kotlin vs. Swift
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/ASCE/1301.1316/2025Keywords:
Mobile Apps; Cross-Platform Comparisons; Mobile Developers; Flutter; Kotlin; Operating Systems; SwiftAbstract
Mobile app development used to be based on a single platform, and developers had to create apps for iOS and Android separately. However, cross-platform mobile development productivity is widely recognized in the market. The objective of the research was toconduct a comparative analysis of mobile development productivity: Flutter vs. Kotlin vs. Swift. The research was conducted using a non-experimental design, descriptive scope, analytical method, and qualitative approach. A comparative evaluation was conducted of the productivity advantages of each developer. It was learned that the choice of technology used for mobile app development directly impacts team productivity, whether Android or iOS. Flutter (hybrid app developer) is positioned as the leader in productivity for cross-platform projects, making it ideal when seeking to maximize efficiency and reduce costs. Kotlin and Swift (native app developers) are the productive choice specifically for native app development. That is, they work for Android or iOS,but not both together, allowing you to take full advantage of all the features of the selected operating system.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M. (2023). Analysis of cross platform mobile application development frameworks. The rapid growth of the mobile application industry has necessitated the introduction.
Biørn-Hansen, A., Rieger, C., Grønli, T., Majchrzak, T., y Ghinea, G. (2020). An empirical investigation of performance overhead in cross-platform mobile development frameworks. Empirical Software Engineering, 25(1), 2997-3040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09827-6
Dos Santos, B. (2024). Partilha de Dados Durante Videoconferência em App Móvel. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Portugal).
Espitia-Acero, J. S. (2020). Empirical testing for establishing benchmarks: process review and comparison between java, kotlin and dart's performance. Uniandes.
GENBETA (2017). Kotlin 1.1 también es para desarrolladores Android. https://bit.ly/4lhioSd
Melovic, S., Stefanovic, D., y Dakic, D. (2025). Design and Implementation of an Electronic Voting System Using Blockchain Technology. In 2025 24th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH), 2(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOTEH64129.2025.10959191
Riaz, M. (2025). Comparative Analysis of React Native, Kotlin, and Flutter for Cross-Platform Mobile Development. https://bit.ly/3I1GAcD
Singh, M., y Shobha, G. (2021). Comparative analysis of hybrid mobile app development frameworks. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 10(6), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijsce.F3518.0710621
SOFCAVI (2023). Que es Flutter. https://bit.ly/4jWYZVA
Stanic, N., y Ćirković, S. (2024). Analysis of Approaches to Developing Kotlin Multiplatform Applications and Their Impact on Software Engineering. In 10th International Scientific Conference Technics, Informatics and Education-TIE 2024, 1(1), 23-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/TIE24.053S
Suri, B., Taneja, S., Bhanot, I., Sharma, H., y Raj, A. (2022). Cross-platform empirical analysis of mobile application development frameworks: Kotlin, react native and flutter. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3590837.3590897
Work Nest Oficial (2020). Lenguaje de programación Swift. https://bit.ly/4laVMT6
Zarichuk, O. (2023). Comparative analysis of frameworks for mobile application development: Native, hybrid, or cross-platform solutions. Вісник Черкаського державного технологічного університету. Технічні науки, 28(4), 19-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62660/2306-4412.4.2023.19-27
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diego Geovanny Falconí Punguil, David Mauricio Cordonez Arias, Edwin Fabricio Damacela Calero, Edison Isaias Pallo Cuchiparte

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.