In vitro interaction between ewe vaginal microbiota and sperm viability in fresh ovine semen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i4.1118Keywords:
Coconut water; CASA; UHT milk; eubiotic vaginal microbiota; MRSAbstract
The vaginal microbiota plays a fundamental role in maintaining the homeostasis of the reproductive tract and fertility in animals. In sheep, its composition differs from that described in other widely studied species in which lactobacilli are abundant, which is associated with particular physiological characteristics of sheep, such as a near-neutral vaginal pH. Despite its importance, available information on the ovine vaginal microbiota, particularly its in vitro interaction with male ovine germplasm, remains limited. This non-experimental and exploratory study aimed to determine the technical conditions required to establish an in vitro interaction between the vaginal microbiota of ewes and the sperm viability of fresh ram semen. Based on this approach, an anaerobic isolation protocol using MRS medium was developed to recover native vaginal microbiota with potential applications in reproductive biotechnologies involving semen handling. Furthermore, the use of alternative extenders, such as coconut water and UHT milk, together with seminal extenders, was shown to simultaneously preserve bacterial and sperm viability under the experimental conditions evaluated. Finally, phenotypic characterization confirmed the isolation of native strains from the vaginal microbiota, while evaluation using the CASA system showed that the interaction between the microbiota and semen did not compromise sperm quality. Overall, these findings provide a methodological basis for future research on microbiota–semen interactions in reproductive biotechnology protocols in sheep.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Aziz Swelum, A., M Saadeldin, I., Ba-Awadh, H., G Al-Mutary, M., F Moumen, A., N Alowaimer, A., & Abdalla, H. (2019). Efficiency of Commercial Egg Yolk-Free and Egg Yolk-Supplemented Tris-Based Extenders for Dromedary Camel Semen Cryopreservation. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 9(11), 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110999
Asaduzzaman, M., Saha, A., Alam, M. G. S., & Bari, F. Y. (2021). Cost comparison of artificial insemination and natural service in sheep breeding system. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 11(4), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2021.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2021.19
Cavalcante, J. M. M., Brasil, O. O., Salgueiro, C. C. M., Salmito-Vanderley, C. S. B., & Nunes, J. F. (2014). Criopreservação do sêmen ovino em meio diluente à base de água de coco em pó (ACP-102c). Ciência Animal Brasileira, 15(3), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v15i327834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v15i327834
Galarza, D. A., López-Sebastián, A., & Santiago-Moreno, J. (2020). Supplementing a skimmed milk–egg yolk-based extender with L-carnitine helps maintain the motility, membrane integrity and fertilizing capacity of chilled ram sperm. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(7), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13687
Gasperin Guazzelli Costa, V., Pereira de Moraes, F., Tomazele Rovani, M., Ferreira, R., Farias Vargas, J. S., Caetano de Oliveira, F., Garziera Gasperin, B., Ivan Gehrcke, M., Diniz Vieira, A., & Mondadori, R. G. (2026). Laparoscopic Artificial Insemination Affects Stress and Inflammatory Markers in Ewes. Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS, 29(3), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2564991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2564991
Reinoso-Peláez, E. L., Puente-Sánchez, F., Serrano, M., Calvo, J. H., Ramón, M., & Saura, M. (2026). Characterization of bacterial communities of ewe’s vaginal tract and its potential impact on reproductive efficiency. Animal Microbiome, 7, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00383-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00383-2
Reis, R., R. A., Torres, R. N. S., Ribeiro, I. M., Torres, C. A. A., & de Freitas, B. W. (2023). Coconut water-based extender for seminal preservation in small ruminants: A meta-analysis study. Small Ruminant Research, 220, Article 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.106915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.106915
Rizkallah, N., Chambers, C. G., de Graaf, S. P., & Rickard, J. P. (2022). Factors affecting the survival of ram spermatozoa during liquid storage and options for improvement. Animals, 12(3), Article 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030244
Serrano, M., Climent, E., Freire, F., Martínez-Blanch, J. F., González, C., Reyes, L., Solaz-Fuster, M. C., Calvo, J. H., Jiménez, M. Á., & Codoñer, F. M. (2020). Influence of the Ovine Genital Tract Microbiota on the Species Artificial Insemination Outcome. A Pilot Study in Commercial Sheep Farms. High-throughput, 9(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht9030016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ht9030016
Swartz, J. D., Held, J., Epperson, W., Daniel, J., & Perry, G. (2014). Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of ewes and cows reveals a unique microbiota with low levels of Lactobacilli and near-neutral pH. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 1, 19. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2014.00019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2014.00019
Toledo-Perona, R., Gomis, J., Sánchez, A., Toquet, M., Bailon-Larrañaga, N., Bataller, E., De la Fe, C., & Gómez-Martín, Á. (2026). Addition of lactic acid bacteria to diluted ram semen as vehicle for vaginal inoculation: interaction with seminal microbiota, sperm quality and antibacterial in vitro effect against Mycoplasma agalactiae. BMC Veterinary Research, 22(1), Artículo 236. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05536-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05536-2
Yániz, J. L., Marco-Aguado, M. A., Mateos, J. A., & Santolaria, P. (2010). Bacterial contamination of ram semen, antibiotic sensitivities, and effects on sperm quality during storage at 15°C. Animal reproduction science, 122(1-2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.006
Zhao, X., Lv, Y., Adam, F. E. A., Xie, Q., Wang, B., Bai, X., Wang, X., Shan, H., Wang, X., Liu, H., Dang, R., Wang, J., & Yang, Z. (2021). Comparison of antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, phylogroups, and biofilm formation of Escherichia coli isolated from intensive farming and free-range sheep. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, Article 699927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699927
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Genesis Odalis Sarmiento Leraux, Daniela Lizbeth Martínez Tacuri, Manuel Esteban Maldonado Cornejo, Silvana Patricia Tamayo Avendaño, Juan Carlos Alvarado Alvarado, Andres Leonardo Moscoso Piedra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Eres libre de:
- Compartir : copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar : remezclar, transformar y desarrollar el material
- El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando usted cumpla con los términos de la licencia.
En los siguientes términos:
- Atribución : Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente , proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios . Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
- No comercial : no puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales .
- CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- Sin restricciones adicionales : no puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros hacer algo que la licencia permite.
