Interdisciplinary project-based learning to strengthen creativity and problem-solving
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70577/asce.v5i1.692Keywords:
ABP; Creativity; Resolution; Collaboration; Technology.Abstract
This research aimed to find out how teamwork on different subjects in projects can help high school students improve their creativity in problem-solving. We used a numbers-based method with a study design that is experimental but not fully controlled. For data collection, validated structured questionnaires were applied to measure creativity and problem-solving, complemented by a structured observation guide to record learning strategies during PBL activities. The study found that the test group scored much higher in creativity and problem-solving than the group that did not receive the Plus treatment. There is a fairly strong link between the two skills, and creativity accounted for almost half of the differences in how people could solve problems. This helps students grow in all areas. These results support the idea that mixing different subjects in PBL is a new way to develop those difficult thinking skills in schools that stick to old-school lessons. It turns out that getting students to work together on projects that use technology can really boost their creative thinking and problem-solving skills. It's a good idea to delve deeper into long-term studies to see if these effects persist and to find out what factors make them work better or worse.
Downloads
References
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Routledge.
Bell, S. (2022). Evaluating project-based learning: Evidence and implications. Educational Research Review, 34, 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100417
Bruner, J. (2020). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2022). Affective and cognitive neuroscience in educational technology. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.2002113
Denham, S., & Brown, C. (2019). Plays nice with others: Social-emotional learning and academic success in early childhood. Early Education and Development, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1502005
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Flavell, J. H. (2021). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2019). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Jensen, E. (2018). Teaching with the brain in mind (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Lee, S., Kim, H., & Park, J. (2023). The impact of interdisciplinary project-based learning on student creativity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000666
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Moreno, R., Fernández, M., & Pérez, C. (2021). Juegos digitales y desarrollo socioemocional en educación inicial: Un enfoque interdisciplinario. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 85(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8522021
OECD. (2021). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/education-v2030-en
Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos [OEI]. (2022). Informe sobre tecnología educativa en educación inicial en Iberoamérica. https://oei.int
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Sousa, D. A. (2021). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071855324
Thomas, J. W. (2020). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation. https://www.autodesk.com/redshift/project-based-learning
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2020). Neuroeducation: Learning, arts, and the brain. W.W. Norton & Company.
UNESCO. (2022). Education and curriculum reforms in developing countries. UNESCO Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MSc. Ana Lucia Vega Padilla, Lic. Evelyn Nataly Tumailla Garcia, Lic. Segunda Manuela Yasaca Pullay, Lic. Benjamín Puculpala Coro, Patricia Elizabeth Parco Mullo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Eres libre de:
- Compartir : copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar : remezclar, transformar y desarrollar el material
- El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando usted cumpla con los términos de la licencia.
En los siguientes términos:
- Atribución : Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente , proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios . Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
- No comercial : no puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales .
- CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- Sin restricciones adicionales : no puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros hacer algo que la licencia permite.
